Pages

17 May 2011

Pakistan: A state in denial

Rather unsurprisingly, conspiracy theories have proliferated across the globe after the announcement of Osama bin Laden’s death and are fast gaining traction, especially in Pakistan where such mindless gossip is bound to press buttons for the wrong people.

Some of these rather unoriginal speculations are:

Osama is not dead.

Osama was taken alive by the US.

Osama died years ago and his body had been kept on ice for almost a decade.

Osama was killed as a pretext to war on Pakistan

Osama was given up by Pakistan.

Osama was killed to secure another term for Obama.

Osama was killed to trump Trump and so on.

Truth be told, here and now, he could have been beamed to another planet and it would not really matter.

The death or the “staged” death, whatever tickles your fancy, will not mark the end of this war against terrorism; it will not end the mulla-driven madness in Pakistan and it will certainly not stop the world from pointing fingers at Pakistan. Nevertheless, all is not lost. It can provide us with a moment of pause, to stop wasting our energy in debating or formulating ridiculous conspiracy theories and just get on with the cleansing process our country so badly needs. It is bad enough we have a neighbouring country feasting on the negative media driven propaganda, that our own people are engulfed by it as well.

State of denial

We are too comfortable in our state of denial. We conveniently place blame on the recurring villain, “America”, for all our problems. The US does not bear the responsibility of ridding us of our problems. The root cause(s) of the problems we face as a nation exist within. But before we can resolve the issues that plague our nation, we need to shoulder the responsibility of curing the epidemic of denial and apathy amongst us.

Pakistan has an enormous task ahead: tackling extremists who are deeply rooted in its communities. If put off for too long, this task is bound to become even more gargantuan and impossible to handle. We need to stop playing the blame game. Lectures on national sovereignty and international law are not going to change how the US chooses to safeguard its own interests. So why don’t we learn from them?

Look for a solution, not at the problem

Public debate and the freedom of speech are vital features of any society’s growth and advancement but it is self-deprecating to dwell on something that either happened in the past or we have no control over. A healthy debate is enriching but surely there is a difference between obsessing over outrageous theories and having a debate on impeding issues? After all, the ultimate objective of debate and discussion is to expand our horizons and learn from the past. What have we learnt from Bin Laden’s death? Seemingly, nothing. Why not take this event as one that changes the course of history and steers us onto a path of enlightenment? I myself have spent a considerable amount of time discussing the what’s, why’s and how’s of the Abbottabad raid. But what ought to be the purpose within discourse?

The answer is quite simple: to brainstorm possible next steps for Pakistan. Again, there is a stark difference between debating an issue and letting outrageous conspiracy theories (which may even be true) take over our lives. We are too preoccupied by our anti- American sentiments to really be focusing on the real issues. The truth is we must tackle terrorism not for anyone else but for our own country’s welfare.

Revise terrorism laws

As a public law academic and lawyer, I believe our country is in dire need of revising its anti-terrorism laws as well as its human rights laws. The legal framework of such laws will form the basis for further action against extremism and countering terrorism. We have had hundreds of thousands of people disappear within Pakistan who were allegedly handed over to the US and the UK authorities by our own government. There has been no accountability with regards to such actions by the Pakistani officials. We need tougher laws governing the extradition, detention and trial of terrorist suspects.

Post 9/11, countries around the world were forced to re-evaluate their existing terrorism laws. However, Pakistan ignored the issue entirely, despite the fact that it is arguably the most affected country when it comes to the wrath of terrorism. Bin Laden’s death is a much needed wake-up call. Now more than ever we need to revise or quash our existing laws and promulgate new legislation that aims to maintain the delicate balance between the prevention of terrorism and the safeguarding of human rights. With the imminent threat of terrorism looming over us, we must resign to the fact that we will have to sacrifice certain liberties for the sake of national security.

It is inevitable that Pakistan will face tough times ahead. There will be more unannounced drone attacks, bombardment of skepticism doubting our loyalty towards the counter-terrorism cause and mudslinging by opportunist countries such as India and Israel. We have little control over these repercussions.

What we can control is how we react to the overwhelming pressure and what course we take as a nation. The last thing we need is Pakistanis who are too busy formulating absurd theories, dwelling on the perceived misfortune of Pakistan and the unfairness of US foreign policy.

We have systematically failed as a state to look out for our own welfare. We must shoulder this blame and rectify the problems we face as result. We must shield ourselves from external forces who are blatantly trying to destabilise our statehood. We must also accept that we are not in a position to “shun” the Americans – not unless we want to decimate our future and become an extension of Afghanistan.

It would be foolish to put all our eggs in Bin Laden’s basket so to speak and ignore the backlash that may very well erupt like a plague across Pakistan and beyond. There is little doubt that Pakistan has been hit hard by militants who have come down from the rugged mountains of Afghanistan right into the beloved cities of Pakistan and live amongst us like ticking time bombs.

Revise attitude towards the US

Our ties with the US are pivotal and denying this would be a costly mistake. Pakistanis must shift their collective focus towards the long-term prosperity of the nation. The US government has acknowledged Pakistan’s efforts in countering terrorism on numerous occasions. We have played a vital role in fighting the war against terrorism and we have done so because it is in our national interest.

People seem to conveniently forget what President Obama said in his address announcing the death of Osama Bin Laden. Would the President of the US have ever acknowledged Pakistan’s counter-terrorism efforts if the CIA and in-turn the Oval office suspected the slightest possibility of collusion by ISI or Islamabad? Not in a million years. Doing so would be political suicide.

The truth is, Pakistan and the US are allies, yet most Pakistanis find that hard to accept because of their blinding prejudice. These are the people who are in for a rude awakening. The fact of the matter is that we need the US more than the US needs us. We have an enemy very close to home who will continue to do what it takes to destabilise Pakistan and we cannot afford to take on a super power as well. We must pick our battles wisely.

This is not the time to be led astray by emotions. This is about survival. New Delhi has decided as always to make hay while the sun shines by revisiting the issue of the Mumbai attacks and the alleged Pakistani involvement. It has once again labelled Pakistan as a terrorist state and the ISI as a dangerous unit that harbours terrorists. A bizarrely ironic notion considering the numerous embassies it has in Afghanistan and its sponsorship of sectarian/regional violence in Pakistan.

Stop the ‘revolution’ chants

There is almost always more than meets the eye and it is essential to keep that in mind when deciphering issues. For instance, many of us were rather wooed by the so-called “revolutions” in the Middle East. Might I remind the wooers that these “revolutions” were hailed by none other than the default adversary, the US. Also, in case you haven’t noticed the sudden lull in news from Cairo and Tunis, nothing has really been “revolutionised.” People there are arguably worse off and if not, they are definitely not better off than before.

The media driven frenzy manipulated the truth by ignoring the underlying fact that majority of people there, did not partake in the demonstrations and only wished to revert back to their daily lives. Their livelihood was crippled as the affected cities came to a standstill during the weeks of protests. These are the people who suffered the most and are continuing to bear the brunt of it all. Sitting far away from ground zero, watching the media romanticise the ousting of leaders and killing of terrorists does not relay reality. It is owed to the seductive power of journalistic sensationalism that the grass always seems greener on the other side.

Pakistan was once a nation with a promising future. Let us not waste time any longer. It’s time to revive our founding father, Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s vision for Pakistan.

We need a revolution of minds.

Let us not day dream and leave it at that.

Let’s make this the turning point.

The future lies in our very own hands. And, it may very well be a bright one once again.

15 May 2011

Indo-Pak relations: Back to normal


After the recent brouhaha over cricket diplomacy, it looks like India-Pakistan relations have again slipped into their comfort zone of allegations and counter allegations.

Last month, as I saw Manmohan Singh and Yousaf Raza Gilani in Mohali, I was reminded of David Grey’s song “This year’s love had better last.” But then, in typical Ross and Rachel-esque fashion, statements by our diplomats have begun to resemble “We were on a break” and “No, we weren’t”.

The fact that Osama Bin Laden died only complicated matters. Soon after the news of Bin Laden’s death spread, Indian news channels went into overdrive. Predictably enough, Indian media contemplated conducting similar operations in Karachi to capture Dawood Ibrahim. The common explanation given was “if America could do it, so can we”. May be its just me, but it’s amazing that how insane levels of stupidity can pass off as ‘analysis’ these days. Firstly, even if India had the capability to conduct such an operation, the loss of secrecy due to the media coverage would render it ineffectual.

Secondly, it amazes me how India’s middle classes can be so dismissive about Pakistan. Surely, a country with a 5,00,000 strong army, a relatively advanced air force and most importantly, a sizeable nuclear arsenal is not going to make hay while Indian helicopters hover around Clifton and Defence. America still had the foreign aid card with which it could afford to carry out such an audacious operation. But what do we have? Diddly squat!

It really amazes me how we take the concept of war so lightly. Maybe it’s because the present yuppie generation has never seen a war. Sitting in their air conditioned houses, war seems more like an issue of testosterone rather than blood.

What the Indian media has forgotten in this whole fracas is that the operation to kill Osama was itself illegal and in violation of international laws. Not only did it undermine the territorial sovereignty of Pakistan, there was no trial against Osama. I could go on about the inconsistencies of America’s blundering foreign policy, but I shall leave that to the real experts like Noam Chomsky who had an excellent take on the whole issue.

Anyway, coming back to India, the media circus was soon followed by India’s foreign ministry when it sent the list of the alleged ‘50 Most Wanted’ criminals. The list included the predictable choices like Dawood Ibrahim and Hafiz Saeed, along with several officers of the Pakistani army. Now I am not absolving any of these gentlemen of their alleged crimes. Naturally they should be brought to justice. However, what irks me is the in-your-face crudity with which the demands were made. It seems that the list was not made with the intention of its stated objectives; it was rather an attempt to pre-empt the jingoists at their own game. The government probably wanted to allay fears that it was not a ‘soft state,’ and it was prepared to deal firmly with terrorism.

Real diplomacy is seldom carried out by making grand announcements; instead, it is a result of careful and secretive planning at the lower levels. By all means, India should ask Pakistan to properly investigate into this matter. But, it should use more tact. We should get out of our self-righteous shells and realise that our ‘Big Brother’ approach is generally not well received by any of our neighbours. It is our inconsistent approach which nullifies any goodwill that we might have earned due to the much hyped cricket diplomacy. The sooner we learn this, the better.

Police protection: Elite Force to be reorganised



LAHORE:

The Elite Force of the police will be reorganised and get separate police lines in the big cities of Punjab next year, said Inspector General (IG) Javed Iqbal at the passing out ceremony for the 13th batch of the Elite Force at the Elite Police Training Centre on Bedian Road on Saturday.

Iqbal said that on the orders of Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, the Elite Force would be reorganised from next year to better combat terrorism and provide security to the public. He said the chief minister had already provided the funding for the reorganisation.

The IG praised the force for their “exemplary performance” in fighting crime in the province. He said that various measures had been taken to enhance the capacity of the force. He thanked Chief of Army Staff Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kiyani for extending his cooperation in the training process. He urged the jawans to serve the public with devotion and dedication. He asked them to focus their energies on the purpose for which they were trained.

The IG was told that since its inception in 1998, the force had carried out 7,961 successful operations, arrested 10,248 criminals and killed 602 hardened criminals. It had also recovered 1,120 stolen cars and Rs33,763,485 in cash and seized 8,630 kilograms of illegal drugs.

Additional IG (Training) Sarmed Saeed, Additional IG (Operations) Rafique Hasan, Additional IG (Investigation) Azam Joyia and Additional IG (Punjab Highway Police) Hamayun Raza Shafi also attended the ceremony.

Security duty

The Elite Force was formed to combat terrorism. Much of it is currently doing so by guarding VIPs, despite instructions from the chief minister that it should not be used for this purpose. Lahore Police currently has 900 Elite Force personnel, of whom around 650 are guarding important personalities.

Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, presiding over a meeting at the Bedian school in April 2009, said that the force should be used only to combat serious crime and not for VIP security duty. He said that rules should be made in this regard. The chief minister also said that Elite Force personnel would not perform static duties as guards. According to their standard operating procedures, Elite Force personnel are not meant to perform static duty for more than five hours, but this is routinely violated. For example, on January 17, 10 Elite Force personnel deputed with Lahore High Court Chief Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry sought a transfer because they were being asked to perform static duty for more than five hours a day.

14 May 2011

Qaddafi says NATO bombs won't get him


I live in a place where I cannot be reached or killed; I live in the hearts of millions: Qaddafi. PHOTO: AFP

TRIPOLI:
Muammar Qaddafi declared in an audio message Friday that he was beyond the reach of NATO bombs, following a government denial of an Italian claim that the Libyan leader was wounded and on the run.

“I want to say to the Crusader cowards that I live in a place where I cannot be reached or killed; I live in the hearts of millions,” Qaddafi said in the message broadcast on state television.

A series of six loud explosions rocked Tripoli late Friday and early Saturday as jets flew overhead. Smoke could be seen rising from one of the sites in eastern Tripoli, witnesses said.

Air raids have rocked the Libyan capital almost nightly, stepping up the pressure on the Qaddafi regime.

In Washington, the Libyan rebel movement’s number two, Mahmud Jibril, was received at the White House by President Barack Obama’s national security advisor.

The White House said the rebels’ National Transitional Council was a “legitimate and credible” voice of the Libyan people. But it stopped short of offering the full diplomatic recognition that Jibril was seeking.

Questions about Qaddafi’s fate arose earlier Friday when Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said Qaddafi was “probably outside of Tripoli and probably also injured.”

He said the reports that Qaddafi was on the run were credible because they came from the Roman Catholic bishop of Tripoli. But the bishop, Giovanni Martinelli, later denied having made any such comment to Frattini.

“What the foreign minister said is not right because I never said that the Libyan leader was wounded,” Martinelli told Radio France Internationale.

“I only said that he was under psychological shock from the death of his son. I did not say he was wounded or that he left Tripoli.”

Libyan government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim told journalists in the capital that Qaddafi “is in very good health, high morale, high spirits,” and “he is in Tripoli.”

Qaddafi’s audio message appeared to have been made sometime after a NATO strike on his Bab al-Aziziya compound early Thursday, because Qaddafi referred to its having “led to the martyrdom of three civilians, journalists.”

Frattini said international pressure was causing “the disintegration of the regime from the inside, which is what we wanted.”

He added that arms depots had been raided by rebels on the outskirts of Tripoli in the past few hours.

Meanwhile, Ibrahim told the news conference in Tripoli that a NATO air strike had killed 11 imams who had gathered in Brega, putting the number of wounded people at 50, including five in critical condition.

A spokesman in Brussels said the Western military alliance had no information on the veracity of the claim.

At the news conference, an imam identified as Nureddin al-Mijrah called for “Muslims all around the world” to kill 1,000 people for each of the dead imams, naming acceptable targets as “France, Italy, Denmark, Britain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.”

With rebel forces claiming to be only 10 kilometres from Zliten, their next main military target on the road to Tripoli, their leadership also advanced on the diplomatic front.

US national security advisor Tom Donilon told Jibril “that the United States views the (National Transitional Council) as a legitimate and credible interlocutor of the Libyan people,” the White House said.

Officials did not say whether Obama dropped by the meeting.

There was no immediate sign of new US financial help for the cash-strapped rebels. But the White House said it was working with Congress on changes to the law to allow a portion of around $30 billion in Qaddafi regime assets blocked in the United States to be funneled towards the opposition.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy will meet Jibril in Paris on Saturday, the French presidency said.

The Libyan opposition, based in the eastern city of Benghazi, wants Washington to recognise the body as “the sole” legitimate interlocutor of the Libyan people, he said.

Unlike France, Gambia, Italy and Qatar, the United States has not fully recognised the NTC. And White House spokesman Jay Carney said such a step was “premature.”

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen also was at the White House Friday for closed-door discussions with Obama.

Rasmussen said NATO was fulfilling its UN-mandated mission in Libya, had saved “numerous lives” and had stopped the Qaddafi regime’s bid to retake the country by force after widespread uprisings.

In The Hague, ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo said he will seek arrest warrants for three people considered most responsible for crimes against humanity in Libya. His office wouldn’t reveal the names, but diplomats expect Qaddafi is among them.

Moreno-Ocampo said he was also investigating the deaths of dozens of sub-Saharan Africans in Benghazi by an “angry mob” who believed they were Qaddafi mercenaries.

In Geneva, the UN refugee agency said it feared that up to 1,200 people fleeing Libya had died in the Mediterranean Sea so far and that it had found evidence that a military vessel refused to rescue one boat.

Mari Gas refuses to sell ‘irregularly’ acquired land


ISLAMABAD:

Mari Gas Company has shelved the plan to construct a new building for its head office in Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Rawalpindi after the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) termed the purchase of land ‘irregular’.

The ministry of petroleum has directed the gas company to return the money to the government that had been spent on the purchase of land. However, the MGCL management has refused to pay the money with immediate effect and requested a delay till land value rises and they can recover the full cost of the land,” sources said.

Earlier, the MGCL board of directors (BOD) at its meeting on September 28, 2009 had approved the plan to build a new head office in DHA at a cost of Rs1.3 billion declaring its present head office in G-10/4 sector of Islamabad a ‘security risk’ that was built 10 years ago.

The MGCL management had also purchased two plots at a high price adjacent to its existing building for expansion. Sources maintained that the funds for the existing building and for new plots were provided by the federal government out of provincial receipts, namely the gas development surcharge.

“Now the BoD of MGDCL has decided to sell the plot in DHA Rawalpindi,” sources said. The board has also observed that prevalent land values were lower and that the company should wait till land prices rise to avoid a loss on resale.

Interestingly, the sources maintained that the plot in DHA was bought at higher rates, making it unlikely that the company will recover the full price of the plot.

Ogra in its decision on fixation of Mari Gas well head gas price for financial year 2010-11 had observed that the petroleum ministry in a letter on May 28, 2010, stated that it had declined MGCL’s request for the construction of a new head office in DHA-II. Ogra had also termed purchase of land for new head office building ‘irregular’, noting that it was purchased without prior approval from the ministry.

MGCL is owned by Fauji Foundation, the government, OGDCL, and private shareholders, with stakes of 40, 20, 20 and 20 per cent respectively.

Based on the petroleum ministry’s stance, Ogra directed MGCL to sell the plot in DHA and add the proceeds into the gas pricing application.

Bin Laden raid 'not an assassination': US attorney general



The US commando raid that killed Osama bin Laden was “not an assassination”, US Attorney General Eric Holder said Thursday after the al Qaeda leader’s sons denounced the operation.

Holder told the BBC the raid on bin Laden’s hideout in Pakistan on May 2 was a “kill or capture mission” and that his surrender would have been accepted if offered, but that the safety of US Navy commandos was paramount.

“What happened to bin Laden was not an assassination,” Holder said.”I think the action that we took against him can be seen as an act of national self-defence. You have to remember it is lawful to target an enemy commander,” he said.

The top US legal official said there was no indication that bin Laden was going to surrender and it was believed he could be wearing a suicide vest.

“It was a kill or capture mission. If there was a possibility of a feasible surrender that would have occurred, but their protection, that is the protection of the force that went into the compound, was uppermost in their minds,” said Holder.

“This is a man who swore he would never be taken alive. There were some indications that perhaps he wore a suicide vest, there’s indications that perhaps there were weapons in the room.

“Bin Laden’s body was buried at sea hours after the operation in which US special forces in helicopters flew under Pakistani radar cover and raided a house in the northwestern garrison town of Abbottabad.

Bin Laden’s sons on Tuesday denounced his “arbitrary killing” and burial at sea.In a statement given to the New York Times, the sons asked why their father “was not arrested and tried in a court of law so that the truth is revealed to the people of the world.”

Mr President, make a choice


We should appreciate the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) decision in President Asif Ali Zardari’s dual office case. And, we should hope that the president accepts LHC’s verdict, if he aims to end national conflicts and boost public confidence in the political leadership of the country.

LHC ordered to restrict President Zardari from conducting political activities at the Presidency. The four-member bench headed by the LHC Chief Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry mentioned in its 35-page decision that a president should be neutral. The verdict further declared that the presidency could not be used for political activities.

Our political leaders need to understand that democracy is not a business. Few businessmen are capable of being in politics – neither do they understand the democratic process nor do they have the tolerance or the depth it requires. So Mr President, you should not be following them.

It is clearly stated in Pakistan’s constitution that the president cannot hold any office of profit in the service of Pakistan or occupy any other position carrying right to remuneration for rendering of services. The current constitution gives the president reserve powers, subject to Supreme Court’s (SC) approval or veto, to dissolve the National Assembly, triggering new elections, and thereby to dismiss the prime minister. The president also chairs the National Security Council and appoints the heads of the Army, Navy and Air Force.

Therefore, we all know the significance and the dignity of the president’s post, because he is the head of the state and the guardian of the constitution of Pakistan.

What all this means is that, in times of great crisis, chaos, and uncertainty, the country cannot afford to have a non-neutral head of state.

President Zardari is the co-chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) which in itself has a large span of many complex problems and growing issues which need to be taken care of by the head of the party. All of this, I am sure, puts extreme pressure on the president’s shoulders, who needs to fulfill the duties of both chairs, the PPP and the country.

On other hand, if one believes in team work, the PPP has tremendous leadership like Raza Rabbani, Amin Faheem, Jahangir Badar and many more, who can look after the PPP as well as anyone else. A person who is occupying a dignified post such as the president of Pakistan cannot be expected to involve himself in such kinds of anomalies that go against the constitution, which is a supreme law of the country.

Someone beautifully quoted this:

“Those who enjoy responsibility usually get it; those who merely like exercising authority usually lose it.”

When will our captains understand?

It is common knowledge that Pakistan cricket and controversy go hand in hand, and it seems that the former cannot survive for long without the latter rearing its head.

The last few years, under the rule of the much maligned Ejaz Butt, have been no different, be it the descent of Younis Khan from captaincy, the Muhammad Yousuf captaincy and non-selection saga, the unfortunate Butt, Asif and Amir incident or the regular sacking/resignations of coaches and chief selectors – the people involved at the highest echelons, and the fans too, have perhaps resigned to the fact that it is optimistic to the point of being utterly foolish to expect things to be normal around Pakistan cricket.

However, at least up to the point of Pakistan’s heartbreaking exit at the hands of India in the semi-final, it seemed as if the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) had indeed found a way to keep things moving in a positive direction – with the introduction of Misbah as the Test captain and Shahid Afridi as the two limited overs formats’ captain. The coaching team, consisting of young and intelligent people who understand the game, in the form of Waqar Younis, Aqib Javed and Ijaz Ahmed also seemed to be doing the trick, coupled with our eternal good luck charm Intikhab Alam as manager.

Even after the World Cup, the team played well in West Indies, however lacklustre the series may be made out to be, and everybody was happy, barring the obvious exceptions in Sarfraz Nawaz and Abdul Qadir, who are insatiable perfectionists. Then, came the news that there was something brewing between Afridi and Waqar Younis.

It was recently reported that Afridi was unhappy because of the amount of say Younis was being given in team selection, and this was confirmed when Afridi said something to the effect that everyone should work in their own domain and not interfere with others’ work. While this might seem just another routine episode in the love-hate mutual relationship that Pakistani captains and coaches generally have, for me it underlines a dangerous inherent problem associated with Pakistani captains in particular – bloated egos.

True, we all believe Afridi has transformed the team with his passion, but the fact that he is not one of the greatest readers of the game, cannot be ignored. He needs to understand that the coaches and management staff are there to help him in his job rather than take away his authority, and if his view that the coach should not be involved in the process of team selection is to be accepted, then goodness only knows what coaches are going to do, because certainly team formation and planning is the most important task a modern-day cricket coach has.

There are also reports that the PCB is going to drop Afridi for the upcoming series against Ireland and Zimbawe, which is very sad to say the least. What the PCB needs to do, is to sit the two of them down and clearly define what their respective roles entail so that conflicts like these do not hamper the growth of the visibly talented young Pakistan team.

Let us hope then that Afridi sees sense and understands that he cannot martial his troops alone, that he can put his ego aside when it comes to the good of the team, and also that the very effective Waqar Younis can deal with this issue with tact and know when to back down if a similar situation arises in the future.

6 May 2011


MM ONLINE JOBS

Make Money Online in Pakistan
Just Relax No Experience Required

Earn Dollars With Your Own
Google Adsense Account and
Also Earn from PTC sites…..
UNLIMITED

ONLINE INCOME
AT HOME
It’s Easy
And its fun!......


Get Google Adsense Account just Rs 1200

And PTC sites Account Just 500




Contact Us at

           
OR

Call us at

MIAN USMAN                                                                      MIRZA NADEEM
(CEO MM Groups)                                                                    (GM MM Group)
03017051059                                                                          03003718143

Visit our blog site www.mmonlinejobs.blogspot.com